Gil v. Clara Maass Medical Center

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, P.J.A.D.

In this appeal, we examine clauses contained in insurance policies covering a hospital to determine, among other things, whether the trial judge erred in rejecting plaintiffs’ arguments that an allegedly negligent physician was also covered because he was the hospital’s “employee” or a “leased worker,” or because his limited liability company was “affiliated or associated” with the *374hospital. We conclude the policy language could not be plausibly interpreted to provide coverage to the physician or his limited liability company, and…