Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Bockoven

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1901No. 9,996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court for Hamilton county. Tried below before Sedgwick, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, C.

This is an action brought in the district court for Hamilton county on June 14, 1895, by defendant in error, Anna S. Bockoven, against plaintiff in error, Horace C. Metcalf, to recover thé sum .of $3,954.71, claimed as damages for the prosecution, maliciously and without probable cause, of an action in the district court for Douglas county, Nebraska. Trial was had to a jury, which on February 24, 1897, resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of Anna S. Bockoven, and against Horace C. Met-calf in the sum of $1,977.35. From this judgment Met-calf prosecutes error to this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marbourg v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. McPherson v. RunyonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. McGuire v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Herbert v. KatzbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. McGuire v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API