Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hendry v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 20, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1068Published

1DissentWren, Judge

I cannot agree with the Court’s holding that under A.R.S. § 23-1023(C), the insurance carrier or employer does not have a lien for that part of the thirdparty recovery allocable to (1) pain and suffering, and (2) loss of wages in excess of what would be compensated for under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The decision is apparently premised on the view that since under the Act, a workmen does not have to be reimbursed for pain and suffering, White v. Industrial Commission, 87 Ariz. 154, 348 P.2d 922 (1960), upon such recovery, the carrier or employer should not be entitled to a lien thereon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hornback v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. White v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hornback v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API