City of Amarillo v. Martin
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentSpector, Justice
Under what circumstances does the driver of an emergency vehicle have a duty to drive with due regard for the safety of others as required by article 6701d, section 24(e) of the Revised Civil Statutes? The majority today answers never. I dissent.
Although canons of statutory-construction require us to give effect to all the words of the statute if possible,'see Tex. Gov’t Code § 311.021(2); Chevron Corp. v. Redmon, 745 S.W.2d 314, 316 (Tex.1987), the majority frames this case as a choice between a pure negligence standard and a pure recklessness standard. There is no attempt to harmonize the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Chevron Corp. v. RedmonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Shawnee Township Fire District No. 1 v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Fire Insurance Salvage CorpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.