Legal Opinion

Pettengill v. Shoenbar

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On exceptions. The case appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Assumpsit upon a note and account annexed for goods sold and delivered. The case was heard by the presiding Judge with the right of exceptions. Judgment was rendered for the full amount sued for.

The defendant claimed that there was not sufficient proof of delivery of the goods to hold him liable; but the court ruled otherwise, and this is the only question raised by the exceptions.

A full report of the evidence is not before us, but the exceptions state that the plaintiff was a country store-keeper and the only witness, and that he introduced his books containing charges against the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Backus v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Heywood v. StilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Inhabitants of Sheffield v. Inhabitants of OtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Barrett v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Edmundson v. BricMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. In Re Estate of KnappSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  4. Clapperton v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  5. Hahn v. Billings BrothersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API