Legal Opinion

United States v. Lines

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 3, 1915No. 1453; No. 1454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36162 (T. D. 34668).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal brings here for review two decisions of the Board of General Appraisers. It is the third time that the same merchandise *553has been before this court for a decision as to its proper classification, each case, however, involving different points. The provisions under consideration are paragraphs 400 and 402 of the tariff act of 1909, which, so far as pertinent, read:

400. Handkerchiefs or mufflers composed wholly or in chief value of silk, finished or unfinished, if cut, not hemmed, or hemmed only, shall pay fifty per centum ad valorem; if such handkerchiefs or mufflers are hemstitched…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kaskel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. G. Hirsch Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Clover Linen Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. G. Hirsch Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Paramount Bead Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API