Legal Opinion · Concurrence

MADAIN v. City of Stanton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 2010No. G042218Published

1Concurrence

SILLS, P. J., Concurring.

I agree with and have signed the majority opinion. I write separately, however, to point out the interesting problem in land use law on which this case ultimately centers:

First, over this past decade churches and congregations have increasingly chosen to hold services in industrial parks. A small body of case law, of *1291which today’s opinion now becomes a part, has grown out of that trend.1 A federal statute also looms over such efforts, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, often called RLUIPA. (42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq.)

Second, however,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grace Church of North County v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
  3. Gammoh v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Petra Presbyterian Church v. Village of NorthbrookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  5. International Church of the Foursquare Gospel v. City of San LeandroDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API