Legal Opinion

State v. Jane Doe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1962No. 5042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The defendant was charged with violating RSA 570:25 (supp) (Laws 1959, 5:2) which reads as follows: “570:25 Vagabonds, etc. A vagabond or disorderly person, a person going about begging, a person using any unlawful game or play, a person pretending to have knowledge in physiognomy or palmistry, a person pretending for money, to tell destinies or fortunes or to discover by any spell or secret art where lost or stolen property may be found, a common drunkard, pilferer, or person wanton and lascivious in speech or behavior, shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars, or imprisoned not more…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. . TylkoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. City of Chicago v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. State v. SumanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. InselburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. State v. HoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API