Legal Opinion
Collins v. Dacus
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 12, 1955No. 18924PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
Manifestly the claim was for a loss insured against under Code (Ann.) § 56-301. The purpose of this statute was well stated by Judge Broyles in Manufacturing Lumbermen’s Underwriters v. South Georgia Ry. Co., 57 Ga. App. 699, 701 (196 S. E. 244), as follows: “Under the Code, § 56-301 et seq., nonresident fire [which also includes casualty] insurance companies, doing business in this State are required to deposit certain bonds with the treasurer of the State. These bonds are for the protection of the citizens of Georgia who have insurance with the nonresident company, and if…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Seaboard Mut. Casualty Co. v. ProfitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commissioner of Insurance v. Equity General InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963