Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1978No. 56182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Appellant was employed as a sales representative by appellee. He voluntarily terminated his employment and sued claiming appellee owed him specific amounts of both deferred and nondeferred incentive compensation under the company’s compensation plan, which provided for a base salary and for the two classes of incentive compensation. As to appellant’s claim for deferred incentive compensation, the trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment; we must reverse that grant because appellee failed to carry its summary judgment burden of showing conclusively that its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Montgomery Ward & Company v. ReichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Sheppard v. PostCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Burdell v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Gettys v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Advanced Contouring, Inc. v. McMILLAN DIVISION OF STATES ENGINEERING CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Lannert v. Greyhound Computer Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Anderson v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. E. H. Crump Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. MillarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API