Legal Opinion

England v. Deere & Company

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided September 6, 1963No. Civ. A. P-1927Published

1Opinion of the Court

MERCER, Chief Judge.

A trial of this case resulted in a judgment that plaintiff’s patent is valid and that defendant had infringed that patent. England v. Deere & Company, S.D.Ill., 182 F.Supp. 133, after that judgment was affirmed, England v. Deere & Company, 7 Cir., 284 F.2d 460, cert. denied 365 U.S. 870, 81 S.Ct. 904, 5 L.Ed.2d 860, the cause was referred to a special master for an accounting of damages.

Plaintiff’s patent covers a twine holder designed for use as a component of the knotter assembly on twine-tie balers. Defendant, a farm implement manufacturer manufactured wire-tie balers,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  3. William T. Graham and Graham-Hoeme Plow Co., Inc. v. Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc., Roy Jeoffroy and Ray L. JeoffroyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. McGee v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API