Legal Opinion
Tudor v. Yetman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 18, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that as a result of the subject accident, the cervical region of her spine sustained certain injuries. The defendants provided competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, inter alia, that those alleged injuries did not constitute a serious injury within the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jilani v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Dixon v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martinez v. Yi Zhong ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bykova v. Sisters Trans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bykova v. Sisters Trans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012