Legal Opinion
Cleasant v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 2002No. 10A01-0205-CR-194PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Sean D. Cleasant appeals his conviction following a jury trial for Neglect of a Dependent, as a Class D felony. He presents two issues for our review:
1. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
2. Whether the jury's verdicts 1 are fatally inconsistent and require reversal.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 2, 2001, after receiving a tip from a confidential informant, Detective Harold Kramer of the Clark County Sheriffs Department arranged a controlled drug buy with Rafael Stigall. Detective Kramer met Stigall at a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eaglen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
- Ferrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Jordan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bean v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- A.C. v. Hamilton County Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bean v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Trevor Rujuwa v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016