Legal Opinion

Kopecky v. City of Yoakum

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1932No. 1581—5943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCritz, J.

The Court of Civil Appeals makes a very comprehensive statement of the facts and issues. of this case, and, in the interest of brevity, we adopt the statement of that court. We will, however, in the course of this opinion, make such further statement as is necessary to make our holdings clear.

This suit was instituted in the district court of De Witt county, Tex., by the city of Yoakum against Yoakum State Bank; James Shaw, state banking commissioner, and the sureties on several depository bonds of the bank. Trial in the district court resulted in an instructed verdict for the city, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Sullivan v. City of GalvestonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Eastland County v. ChapmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Mathis v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. City of Hallettsville v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hale County v. American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API