Legal Opinion

United States v. Riesbeck

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided December 11, 2014No. 15-0074/CGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CCA 1374. On consideration of Appellant’s petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, we conclude that the issue of improper member selection was not waived because of the exception contained in Rule for Courts-Martial (RCM) 912(b)(3) to the timeliness requirement of RCM 912(b)(1). On its face, RCM 912(b)(3) provides an exception to waiver where the objection is made on the basis of an allegation that the convening authority selected members in violation of RCM 502(a)(1) for reasons other than those listed in Article 25(d)(2),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. RiesbeckCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  3. United States v. RiesbeckCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  4. United States v. Sergeant ROBERT L. ATKINSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API