Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Haggar

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided August 22, 2023No. 4:23-cv-04024Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION DOUGLAS E. ANDERSON, 4:23-CV-04024-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION FOR RECUSAL DANIEL HAGGAR, JULIE RISTY, MINNEHAHA COUNTY, Defendants. Plaintiff, Douglas E. Anderson, commenced a pro se civil rights lawsuit under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights by refusing to file documents in the Minnehaha County Register of Deeds’ office. Dockets 2, 5. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Docket 9, which Anderson opposes, Dockets 11, 18.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas Moran v. Anne-Marie ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Dallas Fletcher and Katherine Fletcher v. Conoco Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Arrowpoint Capital Corp. v. Arrowpoint Asset Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Nathan MeltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API