Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cotton v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1984No. 84-250Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

I find no basis in the record for the assertion in the majority opinion that the tax revenues will be “the principal source of repayment” of the bonds. The record tells us only that the sales and use tax revenues and the revenues generated by the wastewater facility will pay the bonds, we are told nothing of their relative size.

Although the majority opinion notes in passing that this entire project (included the bonds and accompanying sales and use tax) was adopted by the Fayetteville City Council and overwhelmingly approved by the voters of that city (4,885 to 435), the opinion then proceeds…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Jernigan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Snodgrass v. PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. McCutchen v. Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API