Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Chatzidakis

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 84, 85, 87, 89 and 116 Miscellaneous Docket No. 4Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Judge Palladino:

I concur in the result achieved by the majority; I disagree, however, with the rationale employed.

*118The majority correctly outlines the development of the law affecting venue for Commonwealth parties through January 30, 1982 when the Attorney General deleted 37 Pa. Code §111.2, the regulation which designated local offices of the Department of Transportation (DOT) for purposes of venue. The majority then acknowledges that at the time the suits now before us were filed there existed no such designation by the Attorney General, but holds “that the deletion has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Cortese v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API