Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Appeal of IBM Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2007No. COA06-1002Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The majority’s opinion holds the Commission erroneously imposed a burden of persuasion on IBM Credit rather than a burden of production, contrary to the express requirements of In re Southern Railway, 313 N.C. 177, 328 S.E.2d 235 (1985). The majority’s opinion argues the Commission impermissibly placed the burden of proof on IBM Credit. I disagree and vote to affirm the Commission’s final decision. I respectfully dissent.

I. Standard of Review

This Court reviews the Commission’s decision under the whole record test. The whole record test is not a tool of judicial intrusion and this Court only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal of AMP Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. In Re Appeal of McElweeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In Re the Appeals of Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Albemarle Electric Membership Corp. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. In Re the Appeal of WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API