Legal Opinion
Charnesky v. Urban
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
When the defendants, Janies Gottlieb Urban and Charlotte Urban, his wife, executed the chattel mortgage to the plaintiff, Henry Charnesky, on June 7, 1941, this established a lien in favor of the plaintiff on the automobile described in the mortgage. The failure to properly record the mortgage in Michigan, where defendants resided, and failure to file it in Wisconsin when they moved to Wisconsin did not affect the validity of the mortgage between the parties. Manson v. Phoenix Ins. Co. (1885) 64 Wis. 26, 24 N. W. 407. This mortgage continued in full force and effect and could have been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Manson v. Phœnix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re RadeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Owens v. National Boulevard Bank (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Rade v. Denver Public Schools Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Hobl v. LordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Hobl v. LordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990