Chapman v. Vendresca
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERGER, Justice.
This case comes before us on appeal from rulings by the trial justice in the Superior Court denying the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict and granting the defendants’ motion for a new trial. Although the case is presented in a somewhat complex procedural posture, the essential facts are not subject to dispute.
On February 10, 1973, plaintiff, Wayne M. Chapman, entered into a contract with Dominic Vendresca and Pasquale DeLuca (defendants) for the purchase of a portion of a tract of land situated in East Greenwich, Rhode Island. The terms of the contract were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. E.W. Burman, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Coopersmith v. IsherwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Flanagan v. Kelly's System of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
- Theroux v. Bay Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- DiBiasio v. DiFazioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
3Cited by15 opinions
- Elias v. YoungkenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Cerilli v. Newport Offshore, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Dudzik v. Leesona Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Kottis v. CerilliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Excess Insurance v. Factory Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.