Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schoppe v. Calumet & Hecla, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1969No. Calendar 11, Docket 51,942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1DissentDethmers, J.

Is plaintiff’s total disability due to dust disease so that it is subject to the $10,500 limitation of liability provisions of part 7, § 4, of the workmen’s compensation act (CLS 1961, § 417.4 [Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 17.223])l The hearing referee so found. This finding was affirmed by the workmen’s compensation appeal board and plaintiff’s, application for leave to. appeal therefrom was denied by the Court of Appeals. The cause is now here on leave to appeal granted to plaintiff by this Court. 380 Mich 762.

Plaintiff’s claim, as stated in his brief here, is that he “is permanently and totally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coates v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Felcoskie v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. Metal Assemblies, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Clarkson v. Lufkin Rule Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LaForest v. VINCENT STEEL PROCESSING, DIV. OF LETTS IND.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Foster v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Felcoskie v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Felcoskie v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API