Legal Opinion

People v. Plante

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1993No. 2-92-0221PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

The defendant, Michael J. Plante, was convicted of burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 19 — 1(a) (now 720 ILCS 5/19 — 1(a) (West 1992))) after a bench trial. On appeal, defendant contends that (1) the trial court should not have imposed a fine and ordered restitution in an amount equal to the bail posted for him by a third person without first considering his ability to pay that amount and (2) he is entitled to a $5 credit against his fine for each of the nine days he spent in the county jail prior to trial. We modify the sentence.

The defendant was charged with the offense of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HerrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. HareIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. WinklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. JosephAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. StahrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API