Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1924No. 22622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover premiums paid by policemen of the city of Omaha for their official bonds. The individual claim of plaintiff, a policeman, and the claims of other policemen assigned to him aggregate $6,640, for which judgment is demanded. Liability of the city of Omaha, defendant, is asserted under chapter 3 of the city charter, relating to official bonds, one provision thereof being in this form:

“Unless otherwise specified by this chapter, all official bonds shall be executed by one or more surety or guaranty companies of recognized or established responsibility and the cost…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rooney v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Rooney v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town Council of Town of Hudson v. LaddWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Schmitt v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. George v. School Dist. No. 24 of Red Willow CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Town Council v. LaddWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API