Legal Opinion
Bruk v. Razag, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated January 30, 2008, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Razag, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Razag, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sloane v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Marshall v. Jeffrey Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pryzywalny v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Arzola v. Boston Properties Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Roy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kramer v. SBR & CAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Baratta v. Eden Roc Ny, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.