Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. White Eagle Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 15, 1933No. 13,351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adams

White Eagle Oil Corporation recovered judgment against Dougherty in an action upon a promissory note. Dougherty prosecutes error and asks for a supersedeas. We refer to him as defendant and to the corporation as plaintiff, as aligned at the trial.

Defendant, a retail dealer, bought gasoline from plaintiff, and the note in question was given for a balance claimed to be due thereon. Defendant’s evidence shows that prior to the execution of the note, the parties had agreed upon a certain price for gasoline, which, for a considerable time, was duly observed, but that plaintiff afterwards raised…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. KipNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Zuzich v. Leyden Lignite Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Renard Linoleum & Rug Co. v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API