Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zelie Berenbaum and Harriet Berenbaum

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1966No. 8561_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner filed notices of deficiency against the taxpayer and others in connection with their income tax returns for 1959 and 1960. He determined that redemptions of preferred shares of stock in a closely held corporation from the taxpayer and others were essentially equivalent to the distribution of taxable dividends under § 302(b) (1) of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code.

The Tax Court considered the two re-demptions and held that one was essentially equivalent to a dividend but that the other was not. The Commissioner is the petitioner here and seeks review of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. John H. FewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Eva D. Bradbury v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  3. William J. Sullivan and Georgia K. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Keefe, Collector v. CoteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  5. Charles P. Ballenger, Jr., and Myrtle S. Ballenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benjamin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Estate of Otis E. Byrd, Jimmie Lou Byrd, Administratrix, Peitioner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Coyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Coyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API