Legal Opinion · Dissent

Englund v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 28, 1995No. 01-94-00774-CRPublished

1DissentTaft, Justice

On original submission we held that the trial court erred in admitting a “faxed” certified copy of a Cameron County judgment. We found that the facsimile transmission (fax) did not satisfy the authentication requirements of Tex.R.Crim.Evid. 902 and 1005. We initially read these rules to require the contents of a public record to be proved by an original certified copy, certified in accordance with rule 902.

Motion for Rehearing

We are confronted with an extraordinarily persuasive motion for rehearing filed by the Prosecutor Assistance Division of the Office of the Attorney General.1 The. issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API