Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Larimer v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1933No. Docket No. 4245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs recovered judgment for services performed in securing a contract for the sinking of oil-wells. From this judgment the defendant Zellers has appealed.

The amended complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are real estate brokers who reside in Los Angelés; that in 1923 they entered into an agreement with the defendant Sack to pro cure a contract with the Pomona Oil Company to sink oil-wells on lots 15-18, block PI, tract 1901, in Los Angeles County, in consideration of the payment of $14,400 as commissions for their services; that this contract for sinking oil-wells was duly executed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Silvey v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Ford & McNamara, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirsch v. DuryeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Estate of FalcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API