Legal Opinion

Woodland Hills Mining, Inc. v. McCoy

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2003No. 2002-SC-0540-WCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Having failed to convince an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), or the Court of Appeals, an employer continues to maintain that the December 12,1996, version of KRS 342.125(1) is remedial and must be applied to the reopening of a claim that arose and was decided before the amendment’s effective date. Noting that the motion to reopen was filed after December 12,1996, the employer asserts that reopening was sought to redress an increase in disability that occurred after that date. In another argument, the employer maintains that there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Peabody Coal Co. v. GossettKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Maggard v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  4. Brooks v. University of Louisville HospitalKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. McCool v. Martin Nursery & Landscaping, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. Hospitality Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Johnson v. Gans Furniture Industries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dingo Coal Co., Inc. v. TolliverKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Nygaard v. Goodin Bros., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hall v. Hospitality Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API