NXP USA Inc v. Impinj Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 NXP USA, INC., and NXP B.V., CASE NO. 2:20-cv-01503-JHC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: RENEWED MOTION FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE ’092 v. PATENT 10 IMPINJ, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Before the Court is Impinj’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to 15
U.S. Patent No. 7,257,092
(the ’092 Patent). Dkt. # 421 (redacted motion); Dkt # 430 (sealed 16 motion). NXP opposes the motion. Dkt. # 433. 17 For the reasons below, the Court DENIES the motion. 18 I 19 BACKGROUND 20 A. The ’092 Patent 21 The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.