Legal Opinion

Mighty Oak, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 1981No. 80-5PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

The claim of appellant, Mighty Oak, Inc., for loss by fire of a building insured by appellee Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company was denied on the ground that the policy was not applicable because the insured property had been vacant for over 60 days prior to the fire. Appellant sued on the policy alleging that one Lane was an agent of appellee and that Lane had actual knowledge of the vacancy which knowledge, imputed to appellee, constituted a waiver of the vacancy provisions of the policy. At trial appellant presented evidence from which the jury could have found that Lane…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. EckertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Hughes v. PierceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Ritter's Hotel, Inc. v. SidebothamSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilkerson v. Alachua CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API