Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. James

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1920No. 1103PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Armstrong sued James, basing his cause of action upon a contract evidenced by letter reading as follows:

“Abilene, Texas. March 7, 1919.
“Mr. C. W. Armstrong, Wolf City, Texas— Dear Sir: Confirming our conversation of today, I hereby agree to sell you lot 3, block 105, | in the town of Cisco, Texas, being the lot deeded by T. G. Jackson to W. R. Keeble for the sum of $300.00 cash. Same to be paid on receipt of deed and satisfactory title. It is understood that the title is to be perfected and this trade shall not be binding on either party in case the title cannot be made satisfactory to you.
“Tr…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garcia v. YzaguirreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Clifton v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Wheeler v. StylesTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Hall v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. C. W. Hahl & Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bradley v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Miller v. FramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Kelly v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Spencer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Henderson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API