Legal Opinion

Guardino v. Kidd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), entered January 27, 2003, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale and to set aside a foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The defendant waived any defenses to this action and waived his right to appeal by stipulation that was so-ordered by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed (see Ogu v Faulkner, 265 AD2d 469 [1999]; Matter of Department of Social Servs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Social Services v. Herbert R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Ogu v. FaulknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and MacRophage Therapeutics, Inc. v. Capital Royalty Partners II, L.P., Capital Royalty Partners II - Parallel Fund "A", L.P., Capital Royalty Partners II (Cayman) L.P., and Capital Royalty Partners II - Parallel Fund "B" (Cayman) L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API