Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Alleyne

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 1, 2007No. ESCR20061982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KerN, Leila R., J.

Defendants were indicted by the grand jury for a number of offenses involving trafficking in cocaine, possession of firearms and ammunition, receiving stolen property, deriving support from prostitution, intimidation of a witness, and attempt to commit perjury. Defendants now move to suppress the evidence obtained from a number of wiretaps. They argue the Superior Court had no authority to issue wiretap warrants for cellular communications. In the alternative, they argue the government did not: (1) have probable cause, (2) meet the necessity requirement, or (3) identify many…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Bartnicki v. VopperSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. AlleyneMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API