Terst Sons & Co. v. O'Neal
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Henry Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. J. M. Carmichael. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The appeal is prosecuted from the judgment of the court overruling a motion for a new trial. The ground of the motion which requires consideration is that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence. In the case of Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, it was declared as the proper rule, “that the decision of the trial court, refusing to grant a new trial,-on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, will not be reversed, unless, after allowing all reasonable presumptions of its correctness, the preponderance of the evidence against the verdict is so decided, as to clearly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Holland v. Howard Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Morris v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. DennisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Jena Lumber Co. v. Marlowe Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Anderson v. English & WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898