Legal Opinion

Weza v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1941No. Calendar 41,254PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff was a member of the State legislature of 1939. In August, 1939, he accepted an appointment to fill a vacancy in the office of county school commissioner of Ontonagon county. Thereafter the defendants herein, as State officials, refused to pay plaintiff further per diem compensation as a member of the legislature, such refusal being on the ground that by accepting, the office of school commissioner he had vacated or abandoned his office as a member of the legislature. Plaintiff seeks mandamus in this court to compel payment.

So far as pertinent here, the Constitution (1908), art. 5, §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ellis v. LennonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State Ex Rel. Metcalf v. GoffSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
  4. Lodge v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reilly v. OzzardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Stolberg v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Young v. Detroit City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Burton Township v. SpeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Petitpren v. Wayne-Westland Community SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API