Legal Opinion

Seong Sil Kim v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered November 20, 2003, incorporating an order which denied defendant’s posttrial motion to set aside the jury verdict, apportionment of liability and award of damages thereon, and to order a new trial, reversed, on the law, without costs, the jury verdict vacated and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

On May 3, 2000, at 9:19 p.m., defendant New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) received a call relayed by a 911 operator from a person who had been a passenger on a southbound A train.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saborido-Calvo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. DeLeon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M.B. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2015
  2. Bacic v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Papadopoulos v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Papadopoulos v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Pedraza v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API