Legal Opinion
Petito v. Verrazano Contracting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated October 9, 1996, as (1) granted the motion by Ace Contracting, Inc., for renewal of the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against it, upon its default in answering the complaint, which motion was granted by order of the same court dated March 8, 1996, (2) upon renewal, denied the plaintiffs’ motion, and (3) compelled the plaintiffs to accept the answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Putney v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Chiarella v. QuitoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Karlin v. BridgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lupoli v. Venus Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lewis v. CapalboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Scott v. BrickhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Fleet National Bank, N. A. v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Goetschius v. Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001