United States Ex Rel. Eddington v. Lane
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
Keith Eddington and Gary Hart (“Petitioners”) petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, contending that they are unlawfully in the custody of Michael Lane, the Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections; James A. Chrans, the Warden of the Pontiac Correctional Center where Eddington is incarcerated; and James H. Thieret, the Warden of Menard Correctional Center where Hart is incarcerated (“Respondents”). Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Although we find that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States ex rel. Lavis v. O'LearyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- United States v. GonzalezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001