Legal Opinion

Hovald v. Cunningham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 2, 1910No. Gen. No. 15,265PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Tort. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William W. Maxwell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

By this writ of error a judgment against the plaintiff in error for $95 and costs in favor of the defendant in error is sought to be reversed. The record shows that the horse and wagon of defendant in error was injured in a collision with the automobile of plaintiff in error at the intersection of Sacramento avenue and Twelfth street in Chicago, May 8, 1908. The cause was tried before the court, without a jury. No question of law is raised by the record. The evidence is conflicting on the question of negligence. The witnesses were before the trial judge, who had the benefit of observing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haug v. HaugIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bouton v. CameronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephens-Adamson Manufacturing Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  2. Salzman v. BoeingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API