Martin v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

By motion for rehearing, appellants contend, for the first time, that the judgment is void and unenforceable because it fails to show that the court found each of them guilty and as-assessed the punishment against each.

The trial was joint and to the court, without the intervention of a jury.

The judgment affirmatively reflects the following finding, which is tantamount to a jury’s verdict, viz.:

“The Court having heard the information read and evidence submitted, finds the defendant guilty of Contributing to the delinquency of a minor and…