Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Otis, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This is an action, for a divorce on the grounds of habitual drunkenness and of.cruelty. The cause was tried before the Honorable Levi Vilas, who, after finding as to the matters in issue that “the allegations of- the pleadings are not established by the evidence,” directed judgment to be entered for the defendant. Judge Vilas died soon after that; and upon a settled case a motion for a new trial was made before the Honorable Charles E. Otis, who had succeeded Judge Vilas in office. Judge Otis, upon the case thus presented, denied the motion for a new trial; and from that order this appeal is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Hewitt v. BlumenkranzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simonds v. SimondsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Noonan v. SpearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Hughley v. City of WabashaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. School District No. 1, Itasca County v. AitonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Combination Steel & Iron Co. v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API