Legal Opinion

Morgan v. First National Bank in Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1954No. 5805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Justice.

The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s cause of action on the doctrine of damnum absque injuria. Because of the extraordinary facts of this case, it is one probably of both first and last impression.

The facts admitted for purpose of this decision are: On December 3, 1952, appellant executed and delivered to one E. H. Martin a check in her own handwriting for the sum of $16,117, payable to E. H. Martin and Company, and carrying on its face a notation, “For Purchase 100 A. T. & T. Outright.” The check was drawn on the appellee, First…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Sash & Door Co. v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Defiance Lumber Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Andrews v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. National Surety Corp. v. City Bank & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jomack Lumber Co. v. Grants State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism v. City National BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API