Legal Opinion

People v. Cintron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*440Defendant’s original sentence in 2001 unlawfully omitted postrelease supervision. The sentencing court corrected that defect in 2008 by adding a period of postrelease supervision (PRS) to the sentence. At the time of the resentencing, defendant had been released from prison but was still on conditional release. The maximum expiration date of defendant’s sentence was in 2009.

On March 31, 2010, defendant moved, pursuant to CPL 440.20 (1), to vacate the term of PRS because he was not in prison, but was on conditional release, at the time of the resentencing. When the motion was made, the Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. VelezNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CintronNew York Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API