Osborne v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to tlie Circuit Court for Duval county. STATEMENT. Section 9 of Chapter 4115 of the Laws, approved. June 2,1893, provides that “no person shall engage in or manage the business, profession or occupation mentioned in this section, unless a state license shall have been procured from the tax ■ collector, which license-shall be issued to each person on receipt of the-amount hereinafter provided, together with the county judge’s fee of twenty-five cents for each…
Read the full summary
Writ of Error to tlie Circuit Court for Duval county. STATEMENT. Section 9 of Chapter 4115 of the Laws, approved. June 2,1893, provides that “no person shall engage in or manage the business, profession or occupation mentioned in this section, unless a state license shall have been procured from the tax ■ collector, which license-shall be issued to each person on receipt of the-amount hereinafter provided, together with the county judge’s fee of twenty-five cents for each license, and shall be signedjby the tax collector and the county judge, and have the county judge’s seal upon it. Counties…
1Opinion of the Court
.Raney, C. J. :
In the case of Osborne vs. Mobile, 16 Wall., 479, decided in 1872, the ordinance then in question provided that every express and railroad company doing business in the city of Mobile, Ala., and having a business «extending beyond the limits of that state, should pay an annual license of a stated amount, and every such ■ company doing a business within the limits of the ■ state, and .every such company doing business within the city, should take out license, paying therefor • other amounts. Osborne was there, as here, the agent ■of the Southern Express Company, a Georgia…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- In re Seizure of 7 Barrels of WineSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Hardee v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Hiers v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.