Legal Opinion

Simonstad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 12, 1931No. J-608PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff in this case was, on August 28, 1925, appointed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue a prohibition agent, Internal Eevenue Service, for assignment to duty in prohibition district No. 6, with authority to travel outside of said district No. 6 anywhere within the limits of the United States as his official duties might require. Washington, D. C., was designated as his post of duty.

*440The plaintiff’s salary was fixed at $1,860.00 per annum, with an allowance for necessary traveling expenses, subject to the limitations prescribed by law and the regulations of the Bureau of Internal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, Commissioner of PensionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API