Legal Opinion

Susan Clark v. State of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 2, 2005No. 04-13809; Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket 02-03056-CV-CO-SUnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Susan Clark appeals through counsel the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, the State of Alabama (“the state”), in her retaliation claim, filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3; and in favor of her former supervisor, Lee Eakins (“Eakins”), in her equal-protection claim, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On appeal, Clark argues that the district court erred in concluding that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to these claims. 1 For the reasons set forth more fully below, we affirm the district court’s order…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ash v. SAMBODROMO, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  2. Vandesande v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API