Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Gale

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1862PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Monroe Circuit. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Manning J.:

This is an action on the case for flowing the plaintiff’s land by a mill dam.

The bill of exceptions shows that there was evidence before the jury proving, or tending to prove, that the dam was not. erected by defendant, but by a previous Owner of the land on which it is situated; and that notice Was given to defendant by Thomas Caldwell, when he owned the land now owned by plaintiff, of the overflowing Of it by the dam, and of a request to defendant to remove it.

The Circuit Judge among other things charged the jury, in substance, that if the dam was not erected by defendant, and he…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leahan v. CochranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Clark v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Corby v. RamsdellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. City of Valparaiso v. BozarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API