Sheena Yarbrough v. Decatur Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge:
For years, this Court has allowed district courts to entertain 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suits alleging wrongful termination of housing benefits under the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437 et seq., where the housing authority failed to prove its case for termination by a preponderance of the evidence. See Basco v. Machin , 514 F.3d 1177 , 1183-84 (11th Cir. 2008). But today we recognize that neither Basco nor its progeny explained how a regulation establishing the preponderance of the evidence standard can give rise to a private cause of action under § 1983. With regard to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rodney Manyon Lane v. Ted PhilbinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conrad L. Hoever v. R. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Sheena Yarbrough v. Decatur Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Awnuh v. Public Housing Agency of the City of Saint PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Gonzalez Castillo v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
- Henderson v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.